蜂王乳 Royal Jelly
B 1 C 1 U 1
適應症與證據等級
法規與權威立場 (L4)
L4a · US FDA
立場:cautious
Anna Health, LLC — Fresh Royal Jelly (non-freeze dried) marketed with anti-depression claims and immune-boost claims against Coronavirus / Influenza / Bronchitis / Common Cold are 「new drugs」 under section 201(p) of the FD&C Act because they are not generally recognized as safe and effective for the referenced uses.
來源 ↗ L4b · EU EFSA
立場:against
On the basis of the data presented, the Panel concludes that a cause and effect relationship has not been established between the consumption of royal jelly and the claimed effects.
來源 ↗ L4c · UK NHS
立場:against
Royal jelly, bee pollen and propolis can cause severe allergic reactions, including anaphylaxis, particularly in people with asthma or other allergies. There is no good evidence that these products provide health benefits, and they should be avoided by anyone with a history of allergic reactions to bee stings or bee products.
來源 ↗ L4d · TW TFDA / 衛福部
立場:cautious
蜂王乳(蜂王漿):類別「昆蟲及其來源製取之原料」,屬「可供食品使用之原料」,使用類型為營養添加,無特定每日攝取限量規定,業者應適量添加。我國衛生福利部將蜂王乳視為一般食品原料。
來源 ↗ L4e · WHO
立場:not_addressed
市場與行銷 (L10)
L10a · TW Market Channels
鮮王漿 1000g 含 10-HDA
L10b · TW Legal Identity (TFDA)
食品不得為醫療效能之標示、宣傳或廣告(食安法§28);蜂王乳對部分人具過敏原性但非屬 109/7 公告之 11 項強制標示過敏原
L10c · TW Community (PTT/Dcard/Mobile01)
準備插大時吃蜂王乳有助於體力,唸書比較不會累