Pea Protein for Exercise Recovery

Verdict: Published with Warning

Across 4 PubMed studies, the evidence for Pea Protein in Exercise Recovery grades Tier C — weak evidence. Effective, but with safety or population caveats.

C 🟠 C Weak Evidence Published with Warning

🔬Why this grade7-layer evidence engine

⚖️

Scoring transparency

All scores computed by a 7-layer evidence engine — fully auditable
Raw score 0.62
D
C
B
A
S
← counter-evidence / ineffectiveeffective / strong evidence →
Final grade
C · Published with Warning
Confidence
61%
Broadly consistent
Evidence level
E3
Single high-quality meta-analysis

How strongly each layer supports this effect

lower = less supportive
L1 ExamineGlobal benchmark
0.50
L11 AI re-checkIndependent read
0.50
L2 PubMedPrimary literature
0.60
L3 MechanismPlausibility
0.65
L5 Clinical bodiesAuthoritative stance
0.85
Against Mixed Supports
View the full decision path (audit trail)
  1. compute_raw_score — 加權公式: L2×0.30 + L3×0.25 + L5×0.25 + L11×0.10 + L1×0.10 = 0.622
  2. tier_from_score — 依分數區間映射至 tier letter
  3. apply_hec_rules — 高品質 SR/MA 顯示 positive (1 篇 > 0 negative)
  4. tier_strict_requirement_check — Tier 條件達標,未降階
  5. detect_disputes — 偵測到 0 個 hard + 1 個 soft dispute
  6. decide_status — 依 tier + dispute 結果決定 status

📄PubMed studies (4)L2 · primary research & systematic reviews

Effects of Whey and Pea Protein Supplementation on Post-Eccentric Exercise Muscle Damage: A Randomized Trial
PMID: 32784847 2020 RCT (double-blind) n = 92
Finding: Pea protein showed intermediate (non-significant) reduction in CK/myoglobin vs. water; whey was significantly superior (Cohen's d > 0.80 for CK/myoglobin); no significant difference between pea and whey.
⚠️ Industry-funded Effect size: Pea protein Cohen's d < 0.50 vs. water (non-significant); whey d > 0.80 vs. water (significant)
View on PubMed
Supplementation with Whey Protein, but Not Pea Protein, Reduces Muscle Damage Following Long-Distance Walking in Older Adults
PMID: 36678213 2023 RCT (open-label) n = 45
Finding: Pea protein did not attenuate EIMD vs. placebo; whey significantly reduced CK at 24 h (175 vs. 300 vs. 330 U/L, p < 0.001); pea group not different from placebo.
⚠️ Industry-funded Effect size: null
View on PubMed
Effect of Plant-Based Proteins on Recovery from Resistance Exercise-Induced Muscle Damage in Healthy Young Adults-A Systematic Review
PMID: 40806155 2025 系統性回顧 n = 24
Finding: Single-source pea protein offers limited benefit vs. whey in acute recovery; pea-based blends (e.g., pea+rice) can be comparable to whey when dosed adequately; meta-analysis not conducted due to heterogeneity.
Effect size: null
View on PubMed
Recovery of Strength After Exercise-Induced Muscle Damage in Vegetarians Consuming the Upper and Lower Ends of Protein Recommendations for Athletes
PMID: 40292443 2025 RCT (double-blind) n = 16
Finding: Significant time effect for recovery (p < 0.001), but no significant difference between low-protein (1.2 g/kg) and high-protein (2.0 g/kg) conditions for any recovery marker.
🟠 Limited quality Government Effect size: null
View on PubMed

🏛️Regulatory & authoritative positionsL4/L5 · FDA / EMA / NIH ODS / Cochrane / Mayo …

L4a US FDA
Supportive
FDA has no questions regarding the GRAS status of this substance, based on scientific procedures provided by the notifier. source↗
L4b EU EFSA
Supportive
L4d TW TFDA / 衛福部
Neutral
豌豆仁(豌豆)已收錄於食藥署「食品營養成份資料庫」(consumer.fda.gov.tw),為蔬菜類一般食品。豌豆蛋白(分離豌豆蛋白、豌豆蛋白粉)以一般食品身分在台灣市場流通,未取得健康食品許可證(小綠人)。依《包裝食品營養宣稱應遵行事項》(113年2月19日修正),固態食品每100公克蛋白質含量達12公克以上,始得宣稱「高蛋白質」。 source↗
L5e Specialty Society (condition-mapped)
Supportive
PMID 100% verifiedevery citation checked via NCBI Entrez
🔬4 PubMed studiesindependently re-checked by multiple sub-agents
engine_version: v1.0 claim_id: CLM-COND-recovery-INT-pea-protein-001 繁體中文版 →