Redensyl for Androgenetic Alopecia

Verdict: Taiwan Regulatory Restriction

Across 2 PubMed studies, the evidence for Redensyl in Androgenetic Alopecia grades Tier C — weak evidence.

C 🟠 C Weak Evidence Taiwan Regulatory Restriction

🔬Why this grade7-layer evidence engine

⚖️

Scoring transparency

All scores computed by a 7-layer evidence engine — fully auditable
Raw score 0.43
D
C
B
A
S
← counter-evidence / ineffectiveeffective / strong evidence →
Final grade
C · Taiwan Regulatory Restriction
Confidence
90%
Highly consistent evidence
Evidence level
E6
Multiple smaller RCTs (n<500)

How strongly each layer supports this effect

lower = less supportive
L11 AI re-checkIndependent read
0.30
L2 PubMedPrimary literature
0.40
L1 ExamineGlobal benchmark
0.50
L3 MechanismPlausibility
0.50
L5 Clinical bodiesAuthoritative stance
0.50
Against Mixed Supports
View the full decision path (audit trail)
  1. compute_raw_score — 加權公式: L2×0.30 + L3×0.25 + L5×0.25 + L11×0.10 + L1×0.10 = 0.427
  2. tier_from_score — 依分數區間映射至 tier letter
  3. apply_hec_rules — 無高階證據可裁決
  4. tier_strict_requirement_check — Tier 條件達標,未降階
  5. detect_disputes — 偵測到 0 個 hard + 1 個 soft dispute
  6. decide_status — 依 tier + dispute 結果決定 status

📄PubMed studies (2)L2 · primary research & systematic reviews

A randomized, single-blinded, vehicle-controlled study of a topical active blend in the treatment of androgenetic alopecia
PMID: 32473084 2020 RCT (single-blinded, vehicle-controlled) n = 44
Finding: Among patients on the active Redensyl+Sepicontrol lotion, the majority showed moderate improvement (reported as roughly great 7.7% / moderate 73.1% / stable 19.2% in active group), with the active arm outperforming vehicle. NOTE: this is a Redensyl-CONTAINING multi-ingredient blend (also Sepicontrol A5), single-blinded, with small n; it does NOT isolate Redensyl monotherapy effect.
🟠 Limited quality Effect size: Active blend > vehicle on global improvement (single-blind; effect not attributable to Redensyl alone; no isolated effect size for Redensyl reported)
View on PubMed
A Comparative Study of Topical Procapil With Platelet-Rich Plasma Therapy Versus Topical Redensyl, Saw Palmetto, and Biotin With Platelet-Rich Plasma Therapy in the Treatment of Androgenetic Alopecia
PMID: 37292551 2023 RCT (comparative, two active arms; no placebo) n = 54
Finding: AGA grading score differed significantly between groups (P<0.05); authors concluded PRP with adjuvant Redensyl + saw palmetto + biotin can be a better alternative to current PRP therapies. NOTE: Redensyl was combined with saw palmetto, biotin AND platelet-rich plasma — no vehicle/placebo arm and no isolation of Redensyl's individual contribution.
🟠 Limited quality Effect size: Between-group difference in AGA grade (P<0.05); no isolated Redensyl effect size; no placebo comparator
View on PubMed

🏛️Regulatory & authoritative positionsL4/L5 · FDA / EMA / NIH ODS / Cochrane / Mayo …

PMID 100% verifiedevery citation checked via NCBI Entrez
🔬2 PubMed studiesindependently re-checked by multiple sub-agents
engine_version: v1.0 claim_id: CLM-COND-androgenetic-alopecia-INT-redensyl-001 繁體中文版 →