Sea Buckthorn for Skin Health
Verdict: Published with Warning
Across 5 PubMed studies, the evidence for Sea Buckthorn in Skin Health grades Tier C — weak evidence. Effective, but with safety or population caveats.
C 🟠 C Weak Evidence Published with Warning
Why this grade7-layer evidence engine
⚖️
Scoring transparency
All scores computed by a 7-layer evidence engine — fully auditableRaw score 0.61
D
C
B
A
S
← counter-evidence / ineffectiveeffective / strong evidence →
Final grade
C · Published with Warning
Confidence
76%
Broadly consistent
Evidence level
E3
Single high-quality meta-analysis
▸View the full decision path (audit trail)
- compute_raw_score — 加權公式: L2×0.30 + L3×0.25 + L5×0.25 + L11×0.10 + L1×0.10 = 0.613
- tier_from_score — 依分數區間映射至 tier letter
- apply_hec_rules — 無高階證據可裁決
- tier_strict_requirement_check — Tier 條件達標,未降階
- detect_disputes — 偵測到 0 個 hard + 0 個 soft dispute
- decide_status — 依 tier + dispute 結果決定 status
PubMed studies (5)L2 · primary research & systematic reviews
Effects of dietary supplementation with sea buckthorn (Hippophae rhamnoides) seed and pulp oils on atopic dermatitis
Finding: Both pulp oil (p<0.01) and paraffin oil placebo (p<0.001) groups improved symptomatically; seed oil group did not reach significance (p=0.11). No clear advantage of sea buckthorn over paraffin placebo for dermatitis symptoms; pulp oil did raise HDL (1.38 to 1.53 mmol/L). Yang B is lead author (commonly mis-cited as Yang 2014; PubMed indexed 2004).
View on PubMed Effect of dietary supplementation with sea buckthorn seed and pulp oils on the fatty acid composition of skin glycerophospholipids of patients with atopic dermatitis
Finding: Seed oil slightly increased docosapentaenoic acid (DPA) and decreased palmitic acid in skin glycerophospholipids; pulp oil increased palmitoleic acid (omega-7). No clinical dermatitis severity endpoint reported. Mechanistic/biomarker study underpinning the Yang 1999 trial.
View on PubMed Hippophae rhamnoides oil-in-water (O/W) emulsion improves skin barrier function and skin hydration in healthy male subjects
Finding: Active formulation produced statistically significant improvements in skin hydration (p=0.0003) and TEWL (p=0.0087) vs placebo over 12 weeks in healthy volunteers. Very small sample (n=13), topical not oral, healthy not diseased — pilot/early-phase evidence only.
View on PubMed To compare the effect of sea buckthorn and silver sulfadiazine dressing on period of wound healing in patients with second-degree burns: a randomized triple-blind clinical trial
Finding: Healing period was significantly shorter in the sea buckthorn cream arm vs 1% silver sulfadiazine (p<0.001). Active comparator (not placebo), single-center, modest sample — supports a topical wound-healing signal but not generalizable to consumer 'skin health' supplementation.
View on PubMed The role of sea buckthorn in skin and mucosal health: a review from an anti-inflammatory perspective
Finding: Authors conclude that despite compelling preclinical data on omega-7/vitamin-rich anti-inflammatory effects, human RCT evidence for skin endpoints is sparse, small, and heterogeneous; they explicitly call for large, multi-center, double-blind RCTs to validate efficacy, particularly for moderate atopic dermatitis. No quantitative meta-analytic pooling was possible.
View on PubMed Regulatory & authoritative positionsL4/L5 · FDA / EMA / NIH ODS / Cochrane / Mayo …
L4a US FDA
Supportive
Based on the information provided by SBR Group, Inc. (SBR), as well as other information available to FDA, the agency has no questions at this time regarding SBR's conclusion that sea buckthorn (Hippophae rhamnoides L.) berry, berry juice, and berry puree are GRAS under the intended conditions of use. source↗
L4b EU EFSA
Against
L4d TW TFDA / 衛福部
Neutral
食品不得為醫療效能之標示、宣傳或廣告……食品標示、宣傳或廣告不得有不實、誇張或易生誤解之情形(《食品安全衛生管理法》第28條)。 source↗