Galphimia glauca for Depression

Verdict: Unverified for depression: no human evidence

There is no human trial evidence that Galphimia glauca treats depression, and the limited animal data do not support an antidepressant effect. On current evidence it cannot be recommended for depression.

U ⚫ U Unverified Insufficient Evidence

🔬Why this grade7-layer evidence engine

This claim is graded Unverified (insufficient evidence) because no controlled human trials have tested Galphimia glauca for depression at all. The plant's genuine clinical research is for anxiety (generalized anxiety disorder), which is a distinct condition and cannot be borrowed to support an antidepressant claim. With only animal-level data available, the evidence simply does not reach the bar for a verdict.

The two depression-relevant preclinical studies are unconvincing. A 2006 mouse study (PMID 16360929) found that despite anxiety-reducing effects, the standardized extract failed to change immobility in the forced swimming test, the standard antidepressant screen, a negative result. A 2016 mouse study (PMID 27695258) reported dose-dependent CNS sedation and muscle relaxation; this is sedative 'depressant' activity, not antidepressant action, and does not support efficacy for depression.

No major authority has taken a position. The FDA, EFSA, UK NHS, WHO, NIH Office of Dietary Supplements, Mayo Clinic, Cleveland Clinic, Harvard Health, and the American Psychiatric Association all make no mention of Galphimia glauca for depression. This reflects an absence of evaluation rather than a positive endorsement, so it remains untested for this use.

⚖️

Scoring transparency

All scores computed by a 7-layer evidence engine — fully auditable
Raw score 0.44
D
C
B
A
S
← counter-evidence / ineffectiveeffective / strong evidence →
Final grade
U · Insufficient Evidence
Confidence
50%
Conflicting evidence
Evidence level
E10
Mechanism / case reports / no human evidence

How strongly each layer supports this effect

lower = less supportive
L11 AI re-checkIndependent read
0.20
L2 PubMedPrimary literature
0.40
L1 ExamineGlobal benchmark
0.50
L3 MechanismPlausibility
0.50
L5 Clinical bodiesAuthoritative stance
0.50
Against Mixed Supports
View the full decision path (audit trail)
  1. compute_raw_score — 加權公式: L2×0.30 + L3×0.25 + L5×0.25 + L11×0.10 + L1×0.10 = 0.44
  2. tier_from_score — 依分數區間映射至 tier letter
  3. apply_hec_rules — 僅有 E10 級證據 (cohort/animal/mechanism),不足以下結論
  4. tier_strict_requirement_check — C 級條件未達 (需 E1-E8;實際 E10 僅機轉)
  5. detect_disputes — 偵測到 0 個 hard + 0 個 soft dispute
  6. decide_status — 依 tier + dispute 結果決定 status

📄PubMed studies (2)L2 · primary research & systematic reviews

Anxiolytic and antidepressant-like activity of a standardized extract from Galphimia glauca
PMID: 16360929 2006 Animal Study
Finding: Despite anxiolytic effects in elevated plus-maze/light-dark, the extract was unable to change any parameter in the forced swimming test (no antidepressant-like effect on that measure).
🟠 Limited quality Government
View on PubMed
In vivo Study on Depressant Effects and Muscle Coordination Activity of Galphimia glauca Stem Methanol Extract
PMID: 27695258 2016 Animal Study
Finding: Significant dose-dependent CNS-depressant (sedative) and muscle-relaxant effects; this is sedation, not an antidepressant outcome, so it does not support efficacy for depression.
🟠 Limited quality
View on PubMed

🏛️Regulatory & authoritative positionsL4/L5 · FDA / EMA / NIH ODS / Cochrane / Mayo …

PMID 100% verifiedevery citation checked via NCBI Entrez
🔬2 PubMed studiesindependently re-checked by multiple sub-agents
engine_version: v1.0 claim_id: CLM-COND-depression-INT-galphimia-glauca-001 繁體中文版 →