Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis BB-12 for Common Cold
Across 6 PubMed studies, the evidence for Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis BB-12 in Common Cold grades Tier C — weak evidence. Effective, but with safety or population caveats.
Why this grade7-layer evidence engine
BB-12 does not have strain-specific meta-analytic support for cold prevention. The Cochrane review (PMID 36001877) pools multiple probiotic strains and cannot attribute benefit to BB-12 alone. Hojsak 2016 (PMID 26031908, n=210) found no infection prevention with BB-12.
A separate meta-analysis (PMID 29752587) confirms the BB-12 subgroup showed null effects for respiratory infection outcomes. Marketing often extrapolates genus-level probiotic evidence to specific strains without justification.
Tier C with warning reflects this weak, non-attributable evidence base. Probiotics may help some populations, but BB-12 specifically lacks replicated cold-prevention benefit.
Scoring transparency
All scores computed by a 7-layer evidence engine — fully auditable▸View the full decision path (audit trail)
- compute_raw_score — 加權公式: L2×0.30 + L3×0.25 + L5×0.25 + L11×0.10 + L1×0.10 = 0.457
- tier_from_score — 依分數區間映射至 tier letter
- apply_hec_rules — 無高階證據可裁決
- tier_strict_requirement_check — Tier 條件達標,未降階
- detect_disputes — 偵測到 0 個 hard + 1 個 soft dispute
- decide_status — 依 tier + dispute 結果決定 status